How to Set Up a Reliable CD Offline PipelineContinuous Delivery (CD) pipelines are typically designed around always-on networks, cloud services, and automated artifact stores. But there are many real-world situations where a pipeline must operate offline or with limited connectivity: air-gapped environments, classified or regulated systems, remote sites with intermittent internet, or scenarios where data exfiltration must be prevented. This guide walks through planning, designing, implementing, and maintaining a reliable CD offline pipeline — from requirements and constraints to concrete tools, workflows, and best practices.
1. Understand requirements and constraints
Before designing the pipeline, document the environment and constraints:
- Security and compliance: Are you operating in an air-gapped environment? What regulatory controls (e.g., FIPS, DISA STIGs) apply?
- Connectivity model: Fully offline (no external network), periodically connected (scheduled sync windows), or limited outbound-only?
- Artifact sources: Where do builds and third-party dependencies originate? How will they be transported?
- Deployment targets: Servers, embedded devices, OT equipment, containers, or VMs? What OSes and package formats are used?
- Change/approval workflow: Is automated promotion allowed, or must human approvals occur at each stage?
- Recovery and audit: How will you prove what was deployed and restore to a prior state if needed?
Record these as constraints that will drive architecture decisions (e.g., physically transferring artifacts vs. using a one-way data diode).
2. Design principles for offline CD
Adopt principles that make the offline pipeline robust:
- Minimize trust surface: use signed artifacts and verified provenance so artifacts can be validated without contacting external services.
- Deterministic builds: prefer reproducible builds to ensure artifacts built externally match what will be deployed offline.
- Immutable artifacts: deploy versioned, immutable artifacts (container images, signed packages) rather than ad-hoc builds on the target.
- Explicit sync procedure: define how and when artifacts, dependencies, and metadata will be transported into the offline zone.
- Auditability and provenance: maintain cryptographic signatures, SBOMs (software bill of materials), and deployment logs.
- Graceful rollback: store previous artifact versions and clear rollback steps.
- Least privilege and segmentation: limit who can transfer media into the offline environment and segregate staging from production.
3. Core components of an offline CD pipeline
Typical components — adapted for offline constraints — include:
- Build system (CI): the place artifacts are produced (often on a connected network).
- Artifact repository: stores build outputs (container registry, package repo, or file server).
- Transport mechanism: secure transfer of artifacts into the offline environment (portable encrypted media, data diode, or scheduled sync via a proxy).
- Verification tools: signature verification (GPG, Sigstore/fulcio/tuf), SBOMs, and checksums.
- Deployment automation: configuration management or orchestration within the offline network (Ansible, Salt, Nomad, Kubernetes with an internal registry).
- Observability and logging: local monitoring and log aggregation for the offline environment.
- Access and approval workflow: ticketing, approval UI, or physical sign-off processes.
4. Choosing tools and formats
Select tools that support offline usage and cryptographic verification.
- Artifact formats: container images (OCI), signed tarballs, OS packages (.deb/.rpm), or firmware/OTA bundles. Prefer immutable, versioned formats.
- Registries/repositories: host an internal Docker registry (Harbor, Docker Distribution), APT/YUM repos, or an artifact manager like Nexus/Artifactory that can run offline.
- Signing & provenance: use Sigstore (rekor/fulcio/cosign) if network-limited components are available; otherwise GPG signatures and timestamped attestations. Generate SBOMs (CycloneDX or SPDX).
- Build systems: Jenkins, GitHub Actions (self-hosted), GitLab CI (self-hosted), or Tekton — runable in an on-prem CI server. Ensure builds are reproducible.
- Deployment automation: Ansible (agentless), Salt, or a Kubernetes cluster using an internal image registry and ArgoCD operated fully inside the air-gapped network. ArgoCD can work with a private repo inside the environment.
- Verification frameworks: The Update Framework (TUF) for secure repository sync, or in-house checksum+GPG verification scripts. TUF is designed for untrusted networks and can help secure offline syncing.
5. Typical offline CD workflows
Below are sample workflows for common connectivity models.
Workflow A — Periodic secure sync (most common)
- Build artifacts on the connected CI/CD server; sign artifacts and produce SBOMs.
- Push artifacts to a staging artifact repository (connected).
- Create a curated transfer bundle: select versions, include signatures, SBOMs, metadata, and a manifest.
- Export bundle to encrypted portable media (e.g., LUKS-encrypted drive) or to an internal transfer server that sits on a one-way network interface.
- Physically transport media to the offline environment; the receiving operator checks signatures and manifest, then imports into the internal artifact repository.
- Trigger deployment via local orchestration; run verification and smoke tests.
- Log results locally and produce signed deployment receipts for audit.
Workflow B — One-way sync (data diode)
- Same as above for build and bundle creation.
- Use a one-way replication setup or synchronization server that pushes data through a data diode into the offline repo.
- The offline side verifies signatures and automatically promotes artifacts to staging/production based on preconfigured rules.
Workflow C — Fully air-gapped local build
- Deliver source, build scripts, and approved dependencies via transfer bundle.
- Build inside the air-gapped environment on an internal CI runner to maximize security.
- Sign artifacts locally using internal keys and store artifacts in local repo.
- Deploy using internal orchestration.
6. Secure transfer and artifact validation
- Use cryptographic signatures: every artifact should be signed. Store and distribute public verification keys securely inside the offline zone. Do not rely on transport secrecy alone.
- SBOMs: include SBOMs for dependencies and transitive packages to meet compliance and vulnerability scanning requirements.
- Checksums & manifests: checksums, hashes (SHA-256), and a signed manifest listing all artifacts help ensure integrity.
- Timestamps and notarization: if possible, use an authoritative timestamp or re-sign artifacts inside the offline environment after verification.
- Use secure, tamper-evident media: sealed, encrypted drives and strict chain-of-custody procedures for physical transport.
7. Approval, audit, and compliance
- Implement a formal approval pipeline: maintain signed approval artifacts (emails, tickets, or signed manifests).
- Record every transfer: who moved media, when, and chain-of-custody details. Keep signed receipts.
- Keep detailed deployment logs and signed deployment metadata (who triggered, what artifact versions, checksums).
- Retain old artifacts and manifests for rollback and investigation. Store in an immutable or write-once archive if possible.
8. Testing, verification, and rollback
- Pre-deployment testing: run unit, integration, and system tests before export. For higher assurance, run critical tests both before export and after import in the offline zone.
- Post-deployment smoke tests: automated sanity checks that run immediately after deployment; report results to local logs and sign the results.
- Rollback plan: keep previous artifact versions in the offline repo and document rollback commands and procedures. Automate rollback where safe.
- Disaster recovery: maintain an offline backup strategy for artifacts and configurations, and test restoration periodically.
9. Operational practices and hardening
- Harden all hosts: follow system hardening guides and limit network interfaces.
- Key management: store signing keys in a hardware security module (HSM) or secure vault; minimize access and rotate keys per policy. If keys must be used in the offline zone, use an HSM or procedural protections.
- Patch management: maintain a secure method to bring security updates into the offline environment — treat it like a controlled supply chain operation.
- Logging and monitoring: run local SIEM or logging stacks and ensure logs are preserved per retention policies.
- Least privilege: restrict who can import artifacts, promote to production, or trigger deployments.
10. Example: setting up an air-gapped container-based CD pipeline (concise steps)
- Self-hosted CI (Jenkins/GitLab Runner) builds OCI images; images are signed with cosign and an SBOM is generated (CycloneDX).
- Push images into a connected artifact registry. Create a transfer bundle containing images (tarred), cosign signatures, SBOMs, and a signed manifest.
- Export bundle to an encrypted SSD following chain-of-custody procedures.
- Transport to the air-gapped datacenter. Import images into an internal Harbor or Docker Distribution registry. Verify cosign signatures and SBOMs.
- Use ArgoCD inside the air-gapped Kubernetes cluster to pull images from the internal registry and deploy. ArgoCD reads manifests stored in an internal Git server or a local artifact store.
- Run automated smoke tests, log results, and store signed deployment receipts.
11. Common pitfalls and mitigations
- Pitfall: relying on unsigned artifacts — leads to tampering risk. Mitigation: enforce mandatory signature verification.
- Pitfall: incomplete dependency transfer — missing transitive packages break builds. Mitigation: generate complete SBOMs and dependency bundles.
- Pitfall: weak chain-of-custody for physical media. Mitigation: strict procedures, tamper-evident seals, and logging.
- Pitfall: keys compromised or poorly stored. Mitigation: use HSMs, hardware tokens, and strict access control.
- Pitfall: manual steps cause delays and errors. Mitigation: automate import/verification tasks inside the offline environment as much as policy allows.
12. Measuring reliability and success
Track metrics to prove pipeline reliability:
- Deployment success rate and mean time to recovery (MTTR).
- Time from artifact creation to deployment in offline environment (lead time).
- Number of integrity verification failures (signatures/checksums).
- Frequency of rollback events and root causes.
- Audit completeness: percent of deployments with complete signed metadata and SBOMs.
13. Conclusion
A reliable CD offline pipeline combines disciplined design, cryptographic verification, reproducible artifacts, carefully documented transfer procedures, and automation where possible. The goal is to create a supply chain that preserves integrity, supports audits, and enables predictable deployments even without continuous connectivity. Start small: prove the sync-and-verify pattern with a simple app, then expand toolchains and automation as processes stabilize.
Leave a Reply