WriteMonkey vs. Other Plain-Text Editors: Which Is Best?Writing tools matter. For many writers, a plain-text editor is the workspace that shapes habit, speed, and focus. WriteMonkey is a longtime favorite among distraction-free writing apps, but the plain-text editor space has many strong contenders — from ultra-minimal focused tools to configurable power-editors. This article compares WriteMonkey to several popular plain-text editors, explains their strengths and weaknesses, and helps you choose the best one based on how you write.
What is WriteMonkey?
WriteMonkey is a Windows-based, distraction-free text editor designed specifically for focused, linear writing. It emphasizes an uncluttered, full-screen environment, keystroke-driven navigation, and a battery of small productivity features aimed at keeping words flowing rather than settings tinkering. Key characteristics:
- Distraction-free full-screen interface
- Portable (no-install) version available
- Support for plain-text and basic formatting (Markdown)
- Customizable keyboard shortcuts and plugins
- Built-in timers, session statistics, and typewriter scrolling
WriteMonkey targets writers who want to stay “in the zone” with minimal visual clutter while still having useful writing tools at hand.
Which editors are we comparing?
This article compares WriteMonkey with the following plain-text editors, chosen to represent a range of philosophies and user needs:
- FocusWriter — extreme minimalism with gentle customization
- iA Writer — modern, typographic focus with Markdown features
- Sublime Text — a powerful, extensible general-purpose editor
- Visual Studio Code (VS Code) — feature-rich IDE/editor with many writing extensions
- Typora — seamless Markdown WYSIWYG (what-you-see-is-what-you-get)
- Obsidian — note-focused Markdown editor with linking and graph features
Comparison overview (quick facts)
Editor | Primary focus | Platform(s) | Best for |
---|---|---|---|
WriteMonkey | Distraction-free writing, lightweight tools | Windows | Linear drafting, writers who value keystrokes and simplicity |
FocusWriter | Minimalism, gentle customization | Windows, macOS, Linux | Writers who want a simple, hideaway workspace |
iA Writer | Typographic clarity, Markdown workflow | Windows, macOS, iOS, Android | Writers who prefer clean typography and cross-device consistency |
Sublime Text | Speed, extensibility, coding + writing | Windows, macOS, Linux | Power users who want deep customization and plugin ecosystem |
VS Code | Full-featured editor/IDE, extensible | Windows, macOS, Linux | Writers who use extensions, need project/org tools |
Typora | WYSIWYG Markdown, instant rendering | Windows, macOS, Linux | Writers who want live-rendered Markdown and simple exporting |
Obsidian | Linked notes, knowledge graph, plugins | Windows, macOS, Linux, mobile | Zettelkasten-style note-taking and long-term knowledge management |
Interface and distraction control
WriteMonkey puts emphasis on blank-slate writing with strong keyboard control. Its full-screen mode removes typical UI chrome and offers typewriter scrolling so the current line stays in a comfortable position. It also includes a variety of small focus tools (timers, sessions, text statistics).
- FocusWriter similarly removes distractions and adds “themes” and background options for ambiance.
- iA Writer balances minimalism with refined typography and a clean, readable interface across devices.
- Typora provides a WYSIWYG approach: you see formatted text while writing, which can be less “pure” distraction-free but helps visualize output.
- Sublime Text and VS Code can be made distraction-free with full-screen mode and extensions, but their interface roots are developer-oriented and often reveal many menus and panes.
- Obsidian retains sidebars and panels by design (for linking and graph exploration), so it’s less purely minimal but strong for context-rich workflows.
If your priority is pure single-minded focus, WriteMonkey and FocusWriter are the leading candidates.
Markdown and formatting
Most modern plain-text editors support Markdown workflows to varying degrees.
- WriteMonkey supports Markdown and plain text, with plugins and export options for common formats.
- iA Writer and Typora are explicitly Markdown-first. iA Writer’s focus mode highlights the current sentence; Typora renders Markdown as you type.
- Sublime Text and VS Code are neutral about Markdown but provide excellent plugin ecosystems to handle previews, linting, and export.
- Obsidian is built around Markdown files with advanced linking, transclusion, and metadata support.
If you write in Markdown and want tight, live rendering, Typora or iA Writer are more polished. For a balance of distraction-free writing with basic Markdown needs, WriteMonkey is sufficient.
Extensibility and plugins
- WriteMonkey has a plugin system and supports user scripts, but its ecosystem is smaller and Windows-centric.
- VS Code and Sublime Text are immensely extensible; you can add nearly any feature via community packages (table formatting, academic citation helpers, grammar checkers).
- Obsidian’s plugin ecosystem is large and growing, especially for knowledge management and advanced workflows.
- iA Writer and Typora offer fewer extensions but provide solid core features without requiring plugins.
If you need deep, custom toolchains (integrations, build/export pipelines, complex macros), VS Code or Sublime Text are best. For focused, ready-to-go writing, WriteMonkey, iA Writer, Typora, or FocusWriter work better.
File management and portability
- WriteMonkey is portable and writes plain-text files, which makes data ownership straightforward. Its Windows focus is a limitation for cross-device syncing unless you use cloud folders.
- iA Writer, Typora, and Obsidian rely on Markdown files stored in folders you control — ideal for sync across devices using Dropbox, iCloud, etc.
- VS Code and Sublime manage files like any editor and integrate well with version control systems like Git.
- Obsidian uses a vault concept; everything is local (or sync via paid Obsidian Sync or third-party sync).
For strict portability and local-first ownership, WriteMonkey and Obsidian are strong; for cross-device polished experiences, iA Writer has an edge.
Performance and system resources
WriteMonkey is extremely lightweight and performs well even on older Windows machines. Sublime Text is also fast and low-overhead. VS Code is more resource-hungry due to its Electron base but remains responsive on modern hardware. Typora and iA Writer are generally efficient.
If you need minimal CPU/RAM footprint, WriteMonkey or Sublime Text is preferable.
Collaboration and export
Plain-text editors historically prioritize single-user local editing. Collaboration features vary:
- WriteMonkey: local files; no built-in real-time collaboration.
- VS Code: supports Live Share for real-time collaboration (more code-focused but usable for text).
- Typora, iA Writer, Sublime: no native real-time collaboration; rely on file sync or third-party services.
- Obsidian: local-first, with optional paid sync and community plugins to support publishing and sharing.
For real-time collaborative editing, cloud-native tools (Google Docs, Microsoft Word online) are better choices than any of these plain-text editors. For solo work with later sharing/export, Typora, iA Writer, and VS Code offer robust export options.
Writing features that matter
Consider what features affect writing flow:
- Session timers and writing stats: Built into WriteMonkey and FocusWriter.
- Typewriter scrolling: WriteMonkey and many focused editors.
- Focus mode (sentence/paragraph highlighting): iA Writer and some plugins for other editors.
- Live Markdown preview: Typora and iA Writer (Typora is WYSIWYG).
- Advanced search/replace, regex, macros: Sublime Text and VS Code excel.
- Linking and knowledge graph: Obsidian.
Choose based on which of these you actually use. For example, if session stats motivate you, WriteMonkey or FocusWriter will help. If you frequently manipulate text patterns, Sublime/VS Code are better.
Use-case recommendations
- For distraction-free first drafts, fast typing, and minimal setup: WriteMonkey or FocusWriter.
- For polished Markdown writing with live rendering and export: Typora or iA Writer.
- For heavy customization, automation, and integration with toolchains: VS Code or Sublime Text.
- For note-taking, research, and building a personal knowledge base: Obsidian.
Final decision framework
Ask yourself:
- Do you value absolute minimalism and session tools? — Choose WriteMonkey or FocusWriter.
- Do you want beautiful typography and cross-device consistency? — Choose iA Writer.
- Do you need live Markdown rendering while composing? — Choose Typora.
- Do you require extensibility, macros, or scripting? — Choose VS Code or Sublime Text.
- Are you building a linked-note system or knowledge vault? — Choose Obsidian.
WriteMonkey remains one of the best choices when the goal is distraction-free, keystroke-driven writing on Windows with lightweight features that support sustained drafting. If your workflow requires live Markdown rendering, deep extensibility, or cross-device polish, consider one of the other editors described above.
Leave a Reply